HOME 
CONTACT Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
|
user_manual_telemac-3d [2012/11/26 11:53] m.turnbull Table added |
user_manual_telemac-3d [2014/10/10 15:01] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 429: | Line 429: | ||
| Figure 1 hereinbelow illustrates a TELEMAC-3D three-dimensional mesh. | Figure 1 hereinbelow illustrates a TELEMAC-3D three-dimensional mesh. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{:figure01.png|}} | ||
| ===== 3. THE INPUTS / OUTPUTS ===== | ===== 3. THE INPUTS / OUTPUTS ===== | ||
| Line 811: | Line 813: | ||
| ZSTAR%R(3)=1.D0 | ZSTAR%R(3)=1.D0 | ||
| - | FIGURE 2 | + | {{:figure02.png|}} |
| - | + | ||
| - | (a) 1 : sigma 2 : zstar (b) 3 : fixed horizontal level (c) 4 : horizontal levels | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure 2 : Effect of the MESH TRANSFORMATION keyword . | + | |
| - | (example after the TELEMAC-3D case study of the hydraulic jump) | + | |
| For a better representation of the densimetric stratification areas (thermoclines, halocline and/or | For a better representation of the densimetric stratification areas (thermoclines, halocline and/or | ||
| Line 956: | Line 953: | ||
| * the points belonging either to the free surface or the bottom (refer to Fig. 3). | * the points belonging either to the free surface or the bottom (refer to Fig. 3). | ||
| - | FIGURE 3 | + | {{:figure03png|}} |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure 3 : The various boundaries in TELEMAC-3D (bridge piers case study) | + | |
| By default, TELEMAC-3D automatically handles all the surface and bottom points which do not | By default, TELEMAC-3D automatically handles all the surface and bottom points which do not | ||
| Line 1383: | Line 1378: | ||
| The graph below shows the variations of the mixing length for the various models. | The graph below shows the variations of the mixing length for the various models. | ||
| - | FIGURE 4 | + | {{:figure04.png|}} |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure 4 : Mixing lengths versus depth. | + | |
| In the presence of a vertical density gradient, the environment stability (respectively the instability) | In the presence of a vertical density gradient, the environment stability (respectively the instability) | ||
| Line 1409: | Line 1402: | ||
| becomes higher for the velocities than for the mass. | becomes higher for the velocities than for the mass. | ||
| - | FIGURE 5 | + | {{:figure05.png|}} |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure 5 : Munk and Anderson damping function. | + | |
| === 5.2.3. SMAGORINSKY (HORIZONTAL MODEL) === | === 5.2.3. SMAGORINSKY (HORIZONTAL MODEL) === | ||
